|
Post by tombldr on Apr 12, 2005 17:32:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by RPankn on Apr 12, 2005 17:42:49 GMT -5
Is it any coincedence that Neocon Back Channel Nightly News ran a story by consumer reporter Lisa Myers tonight claiming that Hezbolla (sp?) is terrorising Israelis with unmanned drones, which fly with impunity over Israel and return unscathed to Lebanon. Israel gets what, $10 billion a year in arms and weapons and they're powerless to stop these alleged drone flights?
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Apr 12, 2005 19:04:49 GMT -5
I think this shows that we are completely subjugated by the Usraelis, and that the only thing we see on media is their Israeli agenda.
The uptick in the terrorism scares and the supposed guilt of the Wall Street photo takers, may be associated w/ Sharon's visit and to reinforce that the US is all about Israel-- we care about Hezbollah and Hamas and we're about nothing but using our resources to fight for Israel's expansion.
They (the Israelis/Usraelis) realize they own the country so they just promote whatever is on their agenda.
There is still alot of buzz about an Usraeli attack on Iran in June.
Polls however show that the citizens are not pleased w/ Bush's wars. Perhaps they are returning to his successful "terrorist" protection presidency to boost the fascist bills pending in congress. The Usraelis are behind ALL of these bills.
|
|
|
Post by tombldr on Apr 12, 2005 19:22:54 GMT -5
Is it any coincedence that Neocon Back Channel Nightly News ran a story by consumer reporter Lisa Myers tonight claiming that Hezbolla (sp?) is terrorising Israelis with unmanned drones, which fly with impunity over Israel and return unscathed to Lebanon. Israel gets what, $10 billion a year in arms and weapons and they're powerless to stop these alleged drone flights? I know all the signs of late have pointed to Iran as the next patsies in need of regime change. But last Dec (I think it was), FTW did a big story on Iran, where they predict they will not be invaded. This had to do with the 'line in the sand' which some other great powers have allegedly drawn around Iran by way of financial and military agreements. Iran's alleged posession of "sunburn" missiles could devistate the US Navy. I think mixing it up with Iran could make Iraq's disastrously incompetent colonization look like child's play. The FTW article proposed the next target would be S. Arabia. But who knows about FTW's analysis, they also said last summer that Plamegate would bring down cheneyco even if they stole the Nov election again. Something about CIA/Wall Street's disenchantment with cheneyco's puppetship. OTOH recall we saw cheneyco purging the CIA of dissidents right after the fake election. And things seem perpetually fluid wrt who's next for violent colonization in the ME, and, it seems the Zionists want us to hit Iran real bad. I didn't find the "S. Arabia, Not Iran" story with a quick FTW search.. I think Ruppert may have authored it, seems like last Fall. Maybe it fell down the memory hole, I did find: Stan Goff's 'Persian Peril' & Dale Allen Pfeiffer's 'Target: Iran'There are many varying FTW stories about Iran actually, go here: www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/082404_target_iran.shtmland CTRL-F "Iran" Hey after the cabal stages Fake-911-Two this Spring, and we go to martial law, does anyone think Rove will be dressing up monkeyboy in a military costume? Hmmm maybe Navy whites, like a fearless Admiral!
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Apr 12, 2005 19:32:46 GMT -5
What about Syria? Oh, wait-- no oil. But the oil pretext is itself fake -- the Iraq invasion was designed by those w/ Israeli connections, for Israel, and that is why we are seeing alot of Israeli-based, rather than US "news" at this stage.
They have consolidated their puppet government in Iraq, have established that the Israelis will expand and Palestine w/ be ghettoized, -- nothing anyone can do w/ US forces in the area, and with a US government in place in the area.
They are after pro-Palestinian/ Arab types in Lebanon, Syria, as part of their plan, and so we get this news not understanding that they have been wildly successful in their ME invasion.
|
|
|
Post by tombldr on Apr 12, 2005 19:39:25 GMT -5
I didn't find the "S. Arabia, Not Iran" story with a quick FTW search.. I think Ruppert may have authored it, seems like last Fall. Maybe it fell down the memory hole, Strike that. Found it, I was thrown off by the unlikely title: 12/01/04 FTW ECONOMIC ALERT – AS THE WORLD BURNSVery good article, worth the read. I think I'll post it over at the "economic meltdown" thread, whatever it was called.
|
|
|
Post by Moses on Apr 12, 2005 19:43:58 GMT -5
Did you see the op ed in the FT today re: how Kristol et al sold the war in Iraq to Bushies promising control of oil and how of course that was a flop?
I'll try to find it and post it somewhere. But again, it ignores the real reason for the war. The oil people weren't really interested in the war -- it was for Israel and the oil was like leverage.
|
|