Post by Moses on Jan 2, 2005 11:16:42 GMT -5
Columnist Pipes Calls for Crackdown on Civil Liberties for all Muslim-Americans [/size]
By E&P Staff
Published: December 31, 2004 1:00 pm ET
NEW YORK When an opinion survey released by Cornell University last week found that 44% of Americans wanted to curtail the civil liberties of all Muslim-Americans, with better than one in four saying they should all be required to register their location with the federal government, many commentators expressed concern. Not syndicated columnist Daniel Pipes, however.
In his latest column he declares that he was “encouraged” by the Cornell survey, calling it “good news.” But he also identifies “the bad news,” which he describes as “the near-universal disapproval of this realism. Leftist and Islamist organizations have so successfully influenced public opinion that polite society shies away from endorsing a focus on Muslims.”<br>
In addition to those who want all Muslim-Americans to register, 29% agree that law enforcement agents should infiltrate Muslim civic and volunteer organizations, and 22% said the federal government should profile citizens as potential threats based on the fact that they are Muslim or have Middle Eastern heritage.
Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum, says the backlash against such notions stems from a “revisionist” negative view of the Japanese internment during World War II wielded by such “radical groups” as the American Civil Liberties Union.
He hailed the recent work of columnist Michelle Malkin, who supports the Japanese internment and claims the apology by President Ronald Reagan in 1988, plus the nearly $1.65 billion in reparations paid to former internees, was premised on faulty scholarship.
According to Pipes: “Malkin has done the singular service of breaking the academic single-note scholarship on a critical subject, cutting through a shabby, stultifying consensus to reveal how, given what was known and not known at the time,’ FDR and his staff did the right thing.
“She correctly concludes that, especially in time of war, governments should take into account nationality, ethnicity, and religious affiliation in their homeland security policies and engage in what she calls ‘threat profiling.’<br>
“These steps may entail bothersome or offensive measures but, she argues, they are preferable to ‘being incinerated at your office desk by a flaming hijacked plane.’”