Will Moyers/Now cover 911-truth movement?

[tombldr]

Will Moyers/NOW produce a segment on the 911-truth movement? They may if they hear from tons of viewers asking for one!

I just sent them the following message. Please consider visiting www.pbs.org/now/feedback.html and sending a short message to them asking for a segment on the 911-truth movement. You don't have to focus on David Ray Griffin as I did; you just need to tell them that you'd like them to cover the issue in some manner. Other potential guests could be Michael Moore, or Ellen Mariani/Phil Berg, or Michael Ruppert. I chose to urge Griffin because he's so rational and succinct, as in the Pacifica Radio interview below. He's a professor of philosophy and theology, and author of numerous other, unrelated books. An all around Moyers/NOW kind of guy.

---------
Hello NOW folks. Thanks for bringing us the best show on American TV, period.

Please consider doing a segment with David Ray Griffin, author of "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11". See:

Amazon Link

The book was released in March '04, and so far has 45 Amazon reviews averaging 5 stars.

Griffin also verbally communicates very clearly and rationally. Listen to his interview with Pacifica Radio:

www.septembereleventh.org/documents/griffin_flashpoints_cut.mp3
(43 mins, 10 MBs)

NOW has been bold in covering stories like this which are censored by the corporate media. You were ahead of the curve last summer when Moyers interviewed the heroic 9/11 widows. This marked most domestic viewer's first exposure to the fact that all was not well with the official 9/11 story.

Now, despite the corporate media blackout, there is a fast growing worldwide grass roots 9/11-truth movement with numerous websites, and International 9/11 Inquiries held in March in San Francisco, later this month in Toronto, and in September in NYC:

www.911inquiry.org

Films of speakers from the SF Inquiry can be downloaded free at:

www.snowshoefilms.com

Now the US and the world charge towards post-911 neocon tyranny, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that PNAC Administration, at best, let 911 happen on purpose.

Griffin would be an excellent guest around whom to center a NOW segment on the 911-truth movement. Please consider producing such a segment.

Thank you,

[tombldr]

The OTHER Republican Candidate for President exposes the 9-11 scandal

"Whether you are a Republican, Democrat, Green, Libertarian, independent or any other political flavor, John Buchanan's campaign for the Republican presidential nomination in New Hampshire next week -- on the issue of Bush's 9/11 complicity -- deserves everyone's support. (He's not related to Pat Buchanan.) If given adequate publicity, this scandal could completely change the dynamics of the 2004 Presidential Election, especially since the Republicans are returning to the scene of their crime -- their convention is in New York City just before the 9/11 anniversary."

[Moses]

I'm unhappy w/ Michael Moore. His whole Saudi thing smells like a red herring. He seems to be spinning a distractor. (and also his odd endorcement).

What is your take on the following site?

www.prisonplanet.com

[karpomrx]

The outrage expressed on Prison Planet is justified. My problem is to substantiate information when it comes at one in near overwhelming volumes.
I tend to shy away from the most strident sites, not because I doubt that there are some facts to be gained from them, rather because I am tired of being "sold" a bill of goods. If facts are available, try to present them in a fashion that is most accessable, without the arm twisting of a fanatical preacher at a tent meeting.
The situation we are all in now is a disaster, and shows no signs of improvement. To persuade any thoughtful person, one should strive for simplicity, I mistrust an "expert" that cannot make themself understood by a layman.
I am sure that the facts of 9/11 are such as to shatter the faith of nearly every citizen of the country, hence, no one will learn them.
Moore, and all the fellow travelers of the fantasy world of nationalism, are still caught up by their need to not "rock the boat" too much, as they will lose credibility and a social dislocation of great magnitude is not really part of their liberal agenda.
I am all over the lot on this, so I will stop, for simplicity's sake.
Peace.

[Moses]

I haven't looked at the above-mentioned site for the same reason that you give. I don't have the capacity to sort through the various theories for the facts -- but on the other hand, would really appreciate it if the dots were connected.

I saw a Green from Europe on our international channel and her position vis a vis the UN and Iraq was exactly the same as Richard Perle's-- just worded for a different target audience. I haven't trusted them ever since.

[tombldr]

Moses said:

I'm unhappy w/ Michael Moore. His whole Saudi thing smells like a red herring. He seems to be spinning a distractor. (and also his odd endorcement).

What is your take on the following site?

www.prisonplanet.com

On balance I like Alex Jones. He's a "real conservative" with a heavy libertarian bent, who distinguishes himself from the neocons by his being pro guns, anti-police state.

I tend to believe the Peak Oil theories of Ruppert and others as the ultimate motivation behind the NWO/Globalist police state rollout, but I heard Jones on his radio webstream (link from Infowars.com) say that Peak Oil is nonsense, the oil co's have oil coming out their ears. So we part ways there.

You can download/watch Jones' video, "9/11: Road To Tyranny" for free, I'll post a link to it along with a review in a new thread here in the CT board.