Pentagon Releases 9/11 Crash Video

[RPankn]

And it's the same 4 or 5 frames that's been available on the internet since 2002. Nothing in the frames or video that even remotely looks like a 757. But according to Leslie Blitzer, Jamie Ensor, CNN, the AP, etc., mentioning that fact is "conspiracy theory."

Updated: 03:28 PM EDT

By ROBERT BURNS, AP

WASHINGTON (May 16) - The Pentagon on Tuesday released the first video images of American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the military headquarters building and killing 189 people in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. [That doesn't strain credulity for these media sleepers or Americans? According to the OCT, the largest, most expensive military on earth can't stop a hijacked commercial jetliner from entering the most highly guarded airspace in the world, and then crashing into the most protected and surveilled buiilding in the world? And all they can show later are 4 or 5 mostly blurry frames of video, which shows no plane at all?]

The images, recorded by Pentagon security cameras outside the building, were made public in response to a December 2004 Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch, a public interest group. Some still images from the video had previously been leaked and publicly circulated, but this was the first official release.

The airplane is a thin white blur on the video as it slams into the Pentagon at ground level. Almost instantly a white flash and a huge orange fireball appear on the video, followed by a tower of gray-black smoke. One of the videos shows a Pentagon police car driving in the direction of the impact point shortly after the plane hit. [Amazingly, the lawn and some large spools in front of the facade remained unscathed.]

Traveling at an estimated 350 mph, the hijacked American Airlines plane plowed into the southwest side of the Pentagon at 9:38 a.m. EDT, shortly after two other hijacked airlines were flown into the twin towers at the World Trade Center in New York. The attack set off fires in a portion of the Pentagon and killed 125 people inside, in addition to the 59 passengers and crew and the five men who hijacked the plane at Dulles International Airport. [Yet bodies have never been produced, nor, in the photos, can one see anything that they would expect to see after a commercial plane crash. We just have the FBI's word that those who they said died, died and Barbara Olsen's cell phone call to Ted Olson as "proof" there was a 757 and 4 or 5 "Ay-rabs".]

The Pentagon had previously refused to release the videos, saying they had been provided to the Justice Department as evidence in any criminal proceedings.

"We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11," said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch.

Cheryl Irwin, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said families of the victims of the Pentagon attack were not consulted before the videos were released on the Pentagon's Web site.

5/16/2006 14:59:38


articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060516130609990009&ncid=NWS00010000000001

[RPankn]

Where's AA77?

[nana]

And where was the wreckage? Never saw anything that looked like a jet engine, nor any marks on the building that one would expect if an aircraft's wings hit it. There is always something big enough to recognize as being part of an aircraft after a crash, even a full speed crash.

[karpomrx]

The lack of wreckage, the small impact point, the deep penetration of the interior of the building, the blackout of all available video coverage , which would seem to be enormous, given the number of recorders about the area, both govt. and private, this stinks of lies and liars.
This is the emperors' new clothes, if one could only wake up the hypnotised sheep that want to believe in the good fairy and shock them with the horrible truth that the enemy is the very people that are supposed to be protecting the nation from the "terrorists"

[RPankn]

Jamie McIntyre's Big Lie:

Sept. 11, 2001:

JAMIE MCINTYRE: From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.

Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happenm immediately. It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.

www.total911.info/2005/02/video-cnn-reported-no-plane-hit.html

Audio file here, in Shockwave format: thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/27_1-mcintyre.swf


May 16, 2006:

First, we should ask: why would this video, which doesn't show a 757, be used as evidence at the Moussoui trial? Why did the Pentagon keep it a secret despite the fact frames from the video have been available from numerous sites for about 4 years?

JAMIE MCINTYRE, CNN SENIOR PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: Well, Wolf, the videotapes released today by the U.S. government had been held in evidence for the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui. In fact, they were shown at the trial. But once Moussaoui was sentenced, the government could no longer hold onto them. Under the Freedom of Information Act, they released them as a result of a lawsuit by the judicial watchdog group Judicial Watch.

transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0605/16/sitroom.01.html


But it gets better. McIntyre goes on to contradict what he said on Sept. 11th and tries playing it off as his words being twisted by "internet conspiracy theorists":

MCINTYRE: Wolf, in fact, and I was saying that there was no plane that fell short of the Pentagon, only the one that hit the Pentagon. But don't try telling that to the conspiracy theorists -- Wolf.

transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0605/16/sitroom.03.html

MCINTYRE: The Web sites often take statements out of context, such as this exchange from CNN in which I, myself, appear to be questioning whether a plane really hit the building.

But from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE: Wolf, in fact, I was answering a question about an eyewitness account that a plane had crashed short of the Pentagon, and I was making the point that, no, not near the Pentagon. The only plane that crashed was at the Pentagon.

transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0605/16/sitroom.02.html

No, only Jamie McIntyre is taking his own statements out of context by ommitting the remainder of what he said on Sept. 11th.

Jamie McIntyre, why are you lying?

[RPankn]

P.S.: You're also not supposed to notice the administration stenographers have sneakily been pushing back the time the Pentagon was struck on Sept. 11th, from 9:41 AM to the revised, official time of 9:38 AM. The new time better matches the clocks, shown in photographs of the area where the Pentagon was struck, which all stopped at around 9:31 AM. Not only did these Muslims defy the laws of physics in New York City, and some defied death by surviving the attacks, they warped time too! There have to be some university physics departments out there that would like to talk to them.

[RPankn]

More evidence, as if any were needed, of how bad CNN really is.

Updated: CNN Shopping For Guests To Attack Charlie Sheen
Represents coordinated effort to debunk 9/11 truth movement

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | May 18 2006

CNN is trying to bait 9/11 truth activists to appear as guests on its programs and attack Charlie Sheen. William Rodriguez and Philip Berg appeared on the Alex Jones Show today to expose a smear campaign that seeks to poison the well of the 9/11 truth movement.

WTC survivor and truth activist William Rodriguez was contacted by the Anderson Cooper 360 show and asked if he would go on record as saying the new Pentagon footage dispelled all 9/11 questions. They also requested that he attack Charlie Sheen's public stance on 9/11.

One CNN researcher outright called Charlie Sheen a liar during a phone call with Rodriguez.

After Rodriguez (pictured below) refused to take the bait, telling them he supports Sheen 100%, CNN cancelled his appearance even as the car to pick him up was en route. Rodriguez said CNN were taken aback by the fact that he refused to bad mouth Sheen.

Lawyer Philip Berg and philanthropist Jimmy Walters were also approached by CNN and promised TV time if they agreed to debunk Charlie Sheen. Both refused.

Berg is representing Rodriguez in a RICO suit aimed at bringing charges against US government officials for complicity in 9/11.

Berg was set to appear on Neo-Con Glenn Beck's new CNN show before the slot was cancelled.

After host AJ Hammer and Showbiz Tonight were punished for their balanced 9/11 coverage, the show was bumped to a later slot and replaced by Beck's show.

This represents a coordinated effort to smear Charlie Sheen's viewpoints on 9/11 and poison the well of the wider 9/11 truth movement. CNN are shopping for news and trying to blackmail people into saying what they want them to say.

News networks claimed that the new Pentagon images discredited Charlie Sheen comments regarding what happened to Flight 77. Here is exactly what Sheen told the Alex Jones Show back in March.

"Show us this incredible maneuvering, just show it to us. Just show us how this particular plane pulled off these maneuvers. 270 degree turn at 500 miles and hour descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes, skimming across treetops the last 500 meters," said Sheen.

"I understand in the interest of national security that maybe not release the Pentagon cameras but what about the Sheraton, what about the gas station, what about the Department of Transportation freeway cam? What about all these shots that had this thing perfectly documented? Instead they put out five frames that they claim not to have authorized, it's really suspicious."

Do a handful of fuzzy frames from almost exactly the same vantage point disprove or put to bed any of Charlie Sheen's questions as the news networks claimed?

CNN are also cynically posing as the de facto representatives of the 9/11 families and erroneously claiming that the families oppose any questioning of the official version of events. In reality, a majority of the family members now have questions of their own which remain unanswered and Charlie Sheen was overwhelmed with the support he received from 9/11 survivors and families after his public stance. Other networks like Fox have also used this tactic to try and silence 9/11 dissent.

We remain on guard for the continued unfounded attacks on Charlie Sheen and won't hesitate to expose those who engage in sinister smear campaigns and yellow journalism in an attempt to debunk the 9/11 truth movement.


www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/180506attacksheen.htm

[RPankn]

Someone at the DU Sept. 11th forum was kind enough to blow up one of the frames from the video to 4x.



It's grainy and unclear at that size, but to me the object looks something like this, a Global Hawk UAV, which is made by Northrup-Grumman. Two of these were missing after Sept. 11th, and if I recall correctly, Doug Feith is connected to NG.



This is the best photograph I could find of the profile of the Global Hawk:

[RPankn]

I also saw suggestions that the object might be a Predator drone, pictured here:



And a correction: Doug Feith is connected to McDonnell-Douglas, not Northup-Grumman.

[camaxtle]

Well to me, it was this whole Pentagon picture that had me doubting the authenticity of 9/11. There is no way in hell that THING in the picture is a 757 or anything like a 757. And anyone with half a brain can see it for themselves. But I guess for some of us, it's easier accepting Big Brothers version rather than face the questions and inconsistencies that might make them see the truth. I guess the truth is just too d**n scary for some people to take.

[RPankn]

Wow, the founder of Air America radio is now questioning Sept. 11th.

9/11 Redux -- Renegade U.S. Intelligence

Sheldon Drobny

Does anyone remember the movie Three Days of the Condor? The movie was released in 1976 and starred Robert Redford and Faye Dunaway. Redford's character, Joe Turner had discovered a rogue element of the CIA that was planning an unauthorized attack on the Middle East. Here we are 30 years later and the movie is still thought provoking.

The story really touches on Big Brother and the threat that a secret government entity lived and breathed within the CIA. Robert Reford's character embodied the unsuspecting paranoia that characterized that time. This film has intrigue, suspense, and above all a moral conscience. It presents the idea that what does our government do, and at what cost?

Since 1947 when the National Security Act was passed, the U.S. intelligence agencies have been out of control and there is a strong likelihood that many rogue elements have done some awful things unknown to even our elected officials. I would include among them: John Kennedy's assassination; Martin Luther King's assassination; Robert Kennedy's assassination; 9/11.

The problem with all the official reports on these events including the likes of the Warren Commission and 9/11 Commission is that these investigations only embody information coming from known government agencies and documents. Very little forensic work is done to connect the dots. And the so-called bi-partisan members of these commissions are members of the establishment who would never think of using innovative investigative techniques. The official reports of those commissions seem to always blame everyone, essentially blaming nobody. And the most plausible explanation comes to incompetence of government agencies. Most people recognize that lone assassins did not assassinate John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King. The 9/11 report fails to explain so many improbabilities that it boggles the mind.

I remember when the 4 airplanes were hijacked on 9/11. I was wondering why our NORAD air defense system had not sent fighter jets immediately to escort these planes. Shortly before 9/11, Payne Stewart's private jet went off course due to the jet losing cabin pressure and within minutes there were fighter escorts following the airplane until it crashed. Is it feasible that 4 airplanes were hijacked and not a single fighter escort was available when these airplanes went off course? The 9/11 Commission's explanation is that the FAA, air traffic controllers, and NORAD were all guilty of negligence. Is that really believable? It is about as believable as the "single bullet theory" of the Kennedy assassination or that Jack Ruby killed Oswald because of his patriotism.

I was listening to the Mike Malloy Show on Air America Radio a few days ago. The unanswered questions about 9/11 are starting to be discussed again. Mike Malloy's analysis is that the American people "can't handle the truth" to quote another movie line from A Few Good Men. And that is the problem. 9/11 and other horrid events have probably been acts of those rogues in government intelligence agencies that only serve selected people in government to advance their political goals. As was the case in Three Days of the Condor, it is more likely that these horrid events that are meant to achieve political goals by the very few are done by elements of intelligence agencies that are not even known officially by the CIA or The Defense Department. And if anyone even attempts to unravel this, they are likely to be assassinated.

If I were the head of the CIA, I would not give lie detector tests to uncover the leaks to the media. I would give lie detector tests to find out who are the rogues within these intelligence agencies that are doing us so much harm. However, the chance of me being the CIA director is unlikely. I value my life too much.


www.huffingtonpost.com/sheldon-drobny/911-redux-renegade-u_b_21295.html