Post by RPankn on Mar 20, 2005 6:30:39 GMT -5
Does anyone with IT experience know what the technical stuff means?
Friday, March 18, 2005
Official Take Action Day: Make your voice heard!
As some of you may or may not be well aware of by now, Votergate is real. Votergate is not a joke, and Votergate for a fact did happen on November 2 2004 in six different states around the country. And we now have even more refined proof of it in action, saved and archived for the viewers to disseminate today.
I make it a point to recognize my patrons. Thanks to all of you, and the hardwork of other brilliant researchers who have given me feedback am I able to make this such a timely and important update. To this very date, nothing has been said about full-scale aggregator corruption besides some passing comments on the ChoicePoint identity theft debacle. We are going to change all of that, and permanently.
After some further digging in, we located what is known as the k-collector project. Its an extension of People's Aggregator. While in it itself does not proclaim to be harmful, you might want to judge it for yourself.
tinyurl.com/6qonc
www.evectors.com/itkcollector/
itk-collector it appears was used for years since Nick Chalko and some friends originally started becoming passionate about programming. It essentially drags and collects data in vast amounts, and groups it together over the internet. While it does not tell us essentially that it does anything abusive, I think this paragraph sums up the approach.
"Here's his post....
ApacheBench testing of XML Parsing. So, I've been working on a project called PeopleAggregator, and we've been talking about integrating with a lot of different platforms, among them Drupal. (For the record, this is completely unrelated to the MT stuff that went on today. I may write on that later, but really, everyone else has said what I would in a million different ways.) Anyway, we were talking about RAP and how it's too bulky and slow to work for what we need.So, we got a guy on the team - Joel De Gan, who's working on the PeoplesDNS project for us, and he offered to write us a parser.
This is going to be a replacement for RAP, for those of us who can't deal with the slowness of RAP.Now, I don't know much about RAP. And I don't know much about PHP, or parsing XML, or really anything - I pick up the bits I need to know as I go along. So I'm just kind of standing on the sidelines, but today, I got a demo of what Joel's parser can do.LiveJournal FOAF files are typically big. Mine is no exception - over 100 friends, random contact data, etc. All in all, a 40KB document about me. I want to parse this data. So I attempt to using both RAP and Joel's parser.To alleviate network traffic conditions, I copy the file I want locally.
To simulate the action of opening a file and reading it, I did keep it on the webserver, so I will admit there may be some kind of bias in that, but I used the exact same method to open the file in both cases (fopen) so I don't think that's an issue that would cause any major difference. I also disabled all printed output.Anyway, I used this file to check the parsers. Using ab (apache benchmarking utility - fetches a page a bunch of times and tells you how long it took). Using a 50 request check, I got averages on the two parsing utilities:Joel De Gan's XML parser, parses data into a multileveled array as displayed at crschmidt.net/parse/parse.php (source available): "
In essence, all it takes is one well formulated XML aggregator to combine all the different names and sources used on the internet and other information models. They can then be chained together, and this setting used for collection of registration information and everything the state department supposedly needs on the voters.
However, the mode of priveledge here is pretty diabolical. It now means that all the personal information on someone's religion, someone's field of study, someone's history, is stored and ready to be fed through the system. By definition, the application of its use can now restrict criteria based on pre-defined guidelines. If someone doesn't like to have an Asian Catholic voting, they are never going to register as a vote. And if they further would rather have Saudis voting, a bunch of identities from out of town are re-applied straight into the machine. Likewise, if they would rather restrict population preferences in a single state based on religion or idealology, the straight ticket vote is never going to count. WAYTV told us this, but it was law for only two states they say. Turns out the EIRS database has it happening in far more than two states.
More on this wildcard program. tinyurl.com/6nzcw
tinyurl.com/72dzj
tinyurl.com/57bv5
Note the interesting caption in the right hand square. "Take your chance....Guess who's the president this time! Our machine will calculate the answer." It looks like they even offered prizes, and as dismal as this process appears they used it as an advertising ring and a possible testing ground.
Alan Gutierrez worked with them indirectly. Here's his website. tinyurl.com/4ecch
In regards to registration, just what was Gutierrez proclaiming exactly? In an update we will explore that more. Gutierrez has an outside relationship to the Gutierrez family who rigged elections in the year 2000. He, a sworn "liberal activist" developed the Michigan voter aggregator Publius.
And now finally a threshold of evidence. This website was created by "programmers" essentially practicing, and indeed concerned about vote fraud by everyone in 2004. Most prominently democratic or independant fraud. The system aggregator and its selections really do actually work.
www.dcnet2000.com/~neural/Voting/VotingFraudExample.html
www.freewarepalm.com/misc/floridavotingtabulator.shtml
Florida Voting Tabulator v1.10Size: 7 KBDate: November 17, 2000
Type: FreewareMin. Requirement:• Any hardware• Any OSDownload:• votefla.zip (No long exist)
Author: TealPoint SoftwareHome: www.tealpoint.com/
Email: contact@tealpoint.comDescription: Help Florida select the next President. Don't leave the outcome of the election to their 40-year-old technology.
Instead, use your PalmPilot to choose the next Leader of the Free World, quickly, easily, and with at least as much accuracy.
Update Description:Version 1.10 11/17: Added sound and, ironically, needed arrows next to 'Vote' button for people who didn't know where to tap. "
Surprising results of how fast it worked, isn't it. And that was just the test subject, the programmers apparently didn't talk very openly about the real subject being used in Florida and six other states. Isn't that just a great proposition.
[Continued in next post]
Friday, March 18, 2005
Official Take Action Day: Make your voice heard!
As some of you may or may not be well aware of by now, Votergate is real. Votergate is not a joke, and Votergate for a fact did happen on November 2 2004 in six different states around the country. And we now have even more refined proof of it in action, saved and archived for the viewers to disseminate today.
I make it a point to recognize my patrons. Thanks to all of you, and the hardwork of other brilliant researchers who have given me feedback am I able to make this such a timely and important update. To this very date, nothing has been said about full-scale aggregator corruption besides some passing comments on the ChoicePoint identity theft debacle. We are going to change all of that, and permanently.
After some further digging in, we located what is known as the k-collector project. Its an extension of People's Aggregator. While in it itself does not proclaim to be harmful, you might want to judge it for yourself.
tinyurl.com/6qonc
www.evectors.com/itkcollector/
itk-collector it appears was used for years since Nick Chalko and some friends originally started becoming passionate about programming. It essentially drags and collects data in vast amounts, and groups it together over the internet. While it does not tell us essentially that it does anything abusive, I think this paragraph sums up the approach.
"Here's his post....
ApacheBench testing of XML Parsing. So, I've been working on a project called PeopleAggregator, and we've been talking about integrating with a lot of different platforms, among them Drupal. (For the record, this is completely unrelated to the MT stuff that went on today. I may write on that later, but really, everyone else has said what I would in a million different ways.) Anyway, we were talking about RAP and how it's too bulky and slow to work for what we need.So, we got a guy on the team - Joel De Gan, who's working on the PeoplesDNS project for us, and he offered to write us a parser.
This is going to be a replacement for RAP, for those of us who can't deal with the slowness of RAP.Now, I don't know much about RAP. And I don't know much about PHP, or parsing XML, or really anything - I pick up the bits I need to know as I go along. So I'm just kind of standing on the sidelines, but today, I got a demo of what Joel's parser can do.LiveJournal FOAF files are typically big. Mine is no exception - over 100 friends, random contact data, etc. All in all, a 40KB document about me. I want to parse this data. So I attempt to using both RAP and Joel's parser.To alleviate network traffic conditions, I copy the file I want locally.
To simulate the action of opening a file and reading it, I did keep it on the webserver, so I will admit there may be some kind of bias in that, but I used the exact same method to open the file in both cases (fopen) so I don't think that's an issue that would cause any major difference. I also disabled all printed output.Anyway, I used this file to check the parsers. Using ab (apache benchmarking utility - fetches a page a bunch of times and tells you how long it took). Using a 50 request check, I got averages on the two parsing utilities:Joel De Gan's XML parser, parses data into a multileveled array as displayed at crschmidt.net/parse/parse.php (source available): "
In essence, all it takes is one well formulated XML aggregator to combine all the different names and sources used on the internet and other information models. They can then be chained together, and this setting used for collection of registration information and everything the state department supposedly needs on the voters.
However, the mode of priveledge here is pretty diabolical. It now means that all the personal information on someone's religion, someone's field of study, someone's history, is stored and ready to be fed through the system. By definition, the application of its use can now restrict criteria based on pre-defined guidelines. If someone doesn't like to have an Asian Catholic voting, they are never going to register as a vote. And if they further would rather have Saudis voting, a bunch of identities from out of town are re-applied straight into the machine. Likewise, if they would rather restrict population preferences in a single state based on religion or idealology, the straight ticket vote is never going to count. WAYTV told us this, but it was law for only two states they say. Turns out the EIRS database has it happening in far more than two states.
More on this wildcard program. tinyurl.com/6nzcw
tinyurl.com/72dzj
tinyurl.com/57bv5
Note the interesting caption in the right hand square. "Take your chance....Guess who's the president this time! Our machine will calculate the answer." It looks like they even offered prizes, and as dismal as this process appears they used it as an advertising ring and a possible testing ground.
Alan Gutierrez worked with them indirectly. Here's his website. tinyurl.com/4ecch
In regards to registration, just what was Gutierrez proclaiming exactly? In an update we will explore that more. Gutierrez has an outside relationship to the Gutierrez family who rigged elections in the year 2000. He, a sworn "liberal activist" developed the Michigan voter aggregator Publius.
And now finally a threshold of evidence. This website was created by "programmers" essentially practicing, and indeed concerned about vote fraud by everyone in 2004. Most prominently democratic or independant fraud. The system aggregator and its selections really do actually work.
www.dcnet2000.com/~neural/Voting/VotingFraudExample.html
www.freewarepalm.com/misc/floridavotingtabulator.shtml
Florida Voting Tabulator v1.10Size: 7 KBDate: November 17, 2000
Type: FreewareMin. Requirement:• Any hardware• Any OSDownload:• votefla.zip (No long exist)
Author: TealPoint SoftwareHome: www.tealpoint.com/
Email: contact@tealpoint.comDescription: Help Florida select the next President. Don't leave the outcome of the election to their 40-year-old technology.
Instead, use your PalmPilot to choose the next Leader of the Free World, quickly, easily, and with at least as much accuracy.
Update Description:Version 1.10 11/17: Added sound and, ironically, needed arrows next to 'Vote' button for people who didn't know where to tap. "
Surprising results of how fast it worked, isn't it. And that was just the test subject, the programmers apparently didn't talk very openly about the real subject being used in Florida and six other states. Isn't that just a great proposition.
[Continued in next post]